Posted by Nigel Humphreys on March 22, 2011 at 1:46 PM


The final date for entries to a prestigious National Poetry Competition is poaching on my time. It’s nagging me because I can’t decide whether or no to have a go. I haven’t entered a poetry competition for some considerable time, though I have had some modest success in the past. I suspect I should start testing my luck again but is there enough point ? Do I have anything which may catch the judges’ eyes ? How can I judge, not being a judge? Is it worth a punt? £6 a poem. Hmmm. One could spend quite a little fortune in a year entering all possible competitions but do any of them truly repay the effort of entering: polishing your little darling to a sparkling fleur de coin, printing it out remembering to remove your identity, filling in the entry form, writing a small cheque, hunting high and low for that unfranked stamp you had carefully steamed of a birthday card to your wife, and walking it to the postbox to save ingots of petrol ?


The prize money is handsome in this case but not a little outdone by the prestige of winning a big competition. And let’s face it no matter how good one’s poem is, it’s the judges’ opinions which count; opinions which are inevitably loaded with personal predilections vis-à-vis style and content. Everyone has their own ideas of what constitutes a good poem. If one is clever enough, or can be bothered, there is a case for sending the right horse to the right course. I know a dog breeder who went out of his way at a Championship Show to discover what colour the judge preferred so that he could buy a suit in that shade to wear as he paraded his little pooch in the ring. I kid you not. He decked himself in an outrageous green and won. I had this from the dog’s mouth. Of course to apply this strategy to poetry competitions one would have to acquaint oneself with the judges’ work and send something in the same shade and cut.


And talking of parading animals at shows there are similarities with poetry competitions. When we are all glued to our monitors or TVs next year as they run the Olympic 100 yards in Stratford, London no one in a world wide audience of millions will be in any doubt of the winner. There can be no argument about who stretches his neck beyond the tape first. (Strange that no one gives a flying start about how much the prize money is – is there prize money ?) The first sprinter to pass the winning line wins. End of. On the other hand, Chris my wife breeds fancy rabbits and takes them to shows to compete against other breeders’ rabbits. The judges are always breeders themselves. Ahem. Over a year they judge each other’s rabbits. Ahem, ahem. On any one show day the judge will decide which is the best rabbit in its class, and ultimately which is the best rabbit in the show. There are standards to which breeds should confirm but these are open to rather loose interpretation. So it is always a matter of the judge’s personal opinion at any one time. No one can see the cogs and escapement of their minds and they don’t have to justify their decisions. If a judge fails to acknowledge a former winner’s quality by placing it low, he or she can always say that it wasn’t showing itself to its best advantage that day. Ahem. Others may not agree and quietly carp behind the judge’s back but they have to accept the format no matter how inadequate.


You can see where I’m going with this. There is little transparency or accountability, and to a certain extent this applies to poetry competitions. There is nothing directly comparable to breed standards in the poetry world – not these days anyway - but bad or mediocre poetry usually betrays itself by being boring, unimaginative, unoriginal and derivative. That still leaves many, many, many really good poems to grade in each competition; but what will split them, what quality will push one to the top of the heap? I’m afraid the answer is often luck. As in the fancy world it will be the judges’ opinion and that could change from day to day. If you’re lucky yours may just dovetail with the consensus of current thinking. I was once placed in a competition in which the judge was unwise enough to ring to tell me. Big mistake because he went on to say that on any other day any one of the top five could have won it. His second mistake was to say that he’d put a poem above mine because it dealt with the loss of the poet’s son to which he admitted being not a little sympathetic. It wasn’t this judge’s finest hour but it was revealing.


Poetry judges may be called up on to write a brief justification of course but rarely does that help to clarify why one particular poem beats all others. The fact of the matter is that the winner will always be unjustifiable. Put another way poetry competitions are lotteries and that’s how they should be approached. Send your darlings in by all means but then forget them. Put them right out of your mind. I never ask to be sent the result. If I’m placed I’ll know it, if not do I care who is? All too often one never hears of them again. In the case of the competition I’m entertaining entering now I happened to look at the winners for the last ten years. I recognized two names only and I’m pretty well up on poets who have achieved some sort of recognition in recent years.


Yet, it is worth winning a poem lottery. There is little outlay and, as long as the competition has prestige, it’s a good shop window for the winner. Many of today’s recognised poets began by winning a big poetry competition. Publishers are immediately interested in you. They want to know if you have enough in your nascent canon for a collection. That august arts magazine which for years turned down everything you sent it, suddenly wants to print your work. On the other hand, there’s little virtue in wasting your time entering the Scunthrope Civic Trust Annual Open Poetry Competition to be judged by his worship the Mayor, Brigadier D’Arcy-Featherstone (I’ve made this one up but you get the point).


So will I bother to enter or have I just talked myself out of it? And this is a guy who has never bought a lottery ticket and on that basis, probably having otherwise speculated £1 a week since it began, I’m close on £1,000 better off. On the other hand, each £1 would have bought be the chance to win big. How many weeks did I not win a million pounds ?


So OK, I’ll have a couple of punts. Why not? If I don’t, there’s no way I’ll win and if I win . . . I’ll let you know, or someone will.

Categories: None

Post a Comment


Oops, you forgot something.


The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

Already a member? Sign In


Reply NotsBoona
11:03 AM on January 28, 2023 
42 In May 2000, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in Joy, again reviewed a drug testing policy that was mandatory for students in all extracurricular activities lasix online Q How is testosterone deficiency diagnosed with lab testing
Reply Contino
4:41 AM on January 28, 2023 
cialis prices Effect of acute stress on plasma concentrations of sex and stress hormones in juvenile alligators living in control and contaminated lakes
Reply Nuaddessy
4:38 PM on January 27, 2023 
how much nolvadex for pct The corresponding SARS CoV 2 genomic region and the PCR templates and primers used for this procedure are summarized in Table S3
Reply Havaincat
4:16 PM on January 27, 2023 
Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP 2004 Participation in cancer clinical trials race sex and age based disparities what does lasix do to blood pressure The addition of 10 mmol L DHK also increased aspartate significantly Figure 1B
Reply stirent
2:12 AM on January 27, 2023 
For women who have undergone hysterectomy estrogen only preparations should be used buy cheap cialis discount online com 20 E2 AD 90 20Viagra 20A 20Quoi 20Sert 20 20Viagra 20Lowest 20Prices viagra a quoi sert Sun Art s push into e commerce comes as competition in thehypermarket sector heats up, with a tie up between Tesco and China Resources Enterprise announced thismonth potentially posing a challenge to its lead
Reply NotsBoona
11:29 PM on January 26, 2023 
Immunomodulatory role of melatonin specific binding sites in human and rodent lymphoid cells viagra cost canada 2019
Reply Nuaddessy
11:03 PM on January 26, 2023 
onabotulinumtoxinA and amoxapine both decrease cholinergic effects transmission best price for generic cialis 4 X Research source
Reply Rufassy
7:47 PM on January 26, 2023 
31 Thus, because Cas9 is only active in cardiomyocytes, the percentage of mutated DNA is diluted by noncardiomyocytes by approximately two thirds, and we therefore estimate that the percentage of edited cells is 31 buy pink viagra Since this condition defy the Doctors, my only hope is in the great physician JESUS
Reply Nuaddessy
6:55 PM on January 25, 2023 
A survey of the membership of the North American Society of Phlebology NASP now the American College of Phlebology ACP found that approximately 25 of the members would allow a registered nurse and 20 would allow a nurse practitioner to perform sclerotherapy on spider veins reddit priligy The results were published in July 2018 Adams et al
Reply stirent
2:24 PM on January 25, 2023 
So this medication has been explored in patients that suffer from hyperhidrosis, so excessive sweating, and it s found to be very effective there nolvadex for sale amazon It has recently been suggested that TMX treatment may increase the risk of endometrial carcinoma, most notably in breast cancer survivors BC survivors who are postmenopausal Swerdlow et al
Reply Contino
12:22 AM on January 25, 2023 
Data are mean SEM of n independent experiments donors; for the data in C I, each independent experiment included 3 technical replicates finasteride prescription
Reply Rufassy
5:32 PM on January 24, 2023 
Finally, in The Cancer Genome Atlas analysis of breast tumors 5 this SNP was reported to be an expression quantitative trait loci of the tumor mRNA transcript HS cialis and viagra sales Im devastated and I feel emotional all the time
Reply Blenuesee
4:39 PM on January 24, 2023 
triprolidine increases and ephedrine decreases sedation finasteride prescription B 27 Sentinel Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B 27
Reply stirent
9:49 AM on January 23, 2023 
5 infected but asymptomatic adolescent women who were observed for 2 months or more became symptomatic, but only 2 1 can i buy priligy over the counter Mutations in any of the corresponding genes compromise tubular salt reabsorption and account for Bartter s syndrome type 1, type 2, and type 3, respectively
Reply vaugujle
2:22 AM on January 2, 2023 
???? ???? 2
Reply tkywgitg
7:56 PM on December 26, 2022 
???????? ?????? ?????? ? ??????? ???????? ???????? ????????? ???? ??????
Reply unsusaMic
6:11 AM on December 17, 2022 
propecia no script However, other recent reports disagree Corson et al
Reply Tolluct
6:04 PM on December 16, 2022 
Tykerb package insert 2008 GlaxoSmithKline Research Triangle Park, NC GlaxoSmithKline Google Scholar 30 nolvadex for sale Determinants of the overall response to furosemide pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics
Reply unsusaMic
1:14 AM on December 16, 2022 
C Heatmap of 79 intersection genes in GSE51373 how to buy priligy in usa reviews
Reply unsusaMic
8:24 PM on December 15, 2022 
dapoxetine priligy uk 91, S52 60 2015